Jeremy Hunt told he was keeping his choices open over how the UK could react, and would not remove sanctions. A gathering of activists involved Hong Kong’s parliament on Monday over a questionable removal bill. 

www.internationalnewsheadline.com

Asia News: China cautioned the UK not to “meddle in its residential issues”. Mr Hunt said he would not talk about any potential results “since you would prefer not to incite the very circumstance you are attempting to maintain a strategic distance from”. 
“Obviously you keep your choices open,” he included, demanding the UK would not simply “swallow and proceed onward” if China takes action against dissenters in the previous British settlement. 
Mr Hunt said he “censured all viciousness” however cautioned the Chinese government not to react to the challenges “by repression”.Hong Kong was a British province for over 150 years, yet it was come back to China in 1997 after a bargain was marked by the two nations. 
The 1984 settlement ensured a degree of monetary independence and individual flexibilities not allowed on the territory. Demonstrators contend that a bit of enactment presented by the city’s star Beijing pioneer would make it simpler to move individuals to confront preliminary in China. Mr Hunt repeated that China must respect Hong Kong’s abnormal state of self-rule from Beijing. 
“The core of individuals’ worries has been that extremely valuable thing that Hong Kong has had, which is an autonomous legal framework,” Mr Hunt revealed to Radio 4’s Today program. 
“The United Kingdom sees this circumstance incredibly, truly,” he included. 
China’s diplomat was called to the Foreign Office on Wednesday following “unsatisfactory and erroneous” comments. Liu Xiaoming said relations among China and the UK had been “harmed” by remarks by Mr Hunt and others backing the demonstrators’ activities. 
He said the individuals who unlawfully involved the Legislative Council fabricating and raised the frontier period British banner ought to be “censured as culprits”. He included that it was “dishonest” of UK government officials to scrutinize the absence of vote based system and social equality in Hong Kong when, under British guideline, there had been no decisions nor appropriate to dissent.
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •